<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conspiracy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blacktriangle.org/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blacktriangle.org/blog/?p=1898</link>
	<description>Weblog of Anthony Cox</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:57:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.blacktriangle.org/blog/?p=1898&#038;cpage=1#comment-34779</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blacktriangle.org/blog/?p=1898#comment-34779</guid>
		<description>Andrew: The BBC already do fail to present both sides of a debate - for instance they&#039;re not given to providing much of a platform for the BNP and other groups that would incite violence and hatred (though they do talk about the issues around racial tensions and so on when such matters arise). I think this is generally a sensible policy.

Anthony: good post. I&#039;m always surprised quite how much people assume conspiracy rather than just that a lot of people have the opposing viewpoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew: The BBC already do fail to present both sides of a debate &#8211; for instance they&#8217;re not given to providing much of a platform for the BNP and other groups that would incite violence and hatred (though they do talk about the issues around racial tensions and so on when such matters arise). I think this is generally a sensible policy.</p>
<p>Anthony: good post. I&#8217;m always surprised quite how much people assume conspiracy rather than just that a lot of people have the opposing viewpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.blacktriangle.org/blog/?p=1898&#038;cpage=1#comment-34778</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blacktriangle.org/blog/?p=1898#comment-34778</guid>
		<description>I am in favour of responsible reporting.
 That means investigating why people do not vaccinate.
 It does not include giving airtime to lunatic fanatic antivaccinatorsspreading falsehoods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in favour of responsible reporting.<br />
 That means investigating why people do not vaccinate.<br />
 It does not include giving airtime to lunatic fanatic antivaccinatorsspreading falsehoods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.blacktriangle.org/blog/?p=1898&#038;cpage=1#comment-34777</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 12:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blacktriangle.org/blog/?p=1898#comment-34777</guid>
		<description>So you support censorship then Tony?

The BBC investigating why parents don&#039;t vaccinate is called honest reporting about events in the real world.
If the BBC stop presenting both sides to any debate i will stop paying my licence fee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you support censorship then Tony?</p>
<p>The BBC investigating why parents don&#8217;t vaccinate is called honest reporting about events in the real world.<br />
If the BBC stop presenting both sides to any debate i will stop paying my licence fee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HolfordWatch</title>
		<link>http://www.blacktriangle.org/blog/?p=1898&#038;cpage=1#comment-34776</link>
		<dc:creator>HolfordWatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blacktriangle.org/blog/?p=1898#comment-34776</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Perhaps they see it as a public duty to counter material which is endangering children?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That is entirely why we did it.

Like all our posts, no funding, no outside support. We are sick of the unstoppable flow of wrong-headed and potentially dangerous commentary that passes for expertise and the ridiculous assumptions that underpin antivax rhetoric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Perhaps they see it as a public duty to counter material which is endangering children?</p></blockquote>
<p>That is entirely why we did it.</p>
<p>Like all our posts, no funding, no outside support. We are sick of the unstoppable flow of wrong-headed and potentially dangerous commentary that passes for expertise and the ridiculous assumptions that underpin antivax rhetoric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
