Wakefield was paid to undermine MMR vaccine.
ANDREW WAKEFIELD, the former surgeon whose campaign linking the MMR vaccine with autism caused a collapse in immunisation rates, was paid more than Â£400,000 by lawyers trying to prove that the vaccine was unsafe.
The payments, unearthed by The Sunday Times, were part of Â£3.4m distributed from the legal aid fund to doctors and scientists who had been recruited to support a now failed lawsuit against vaccine manufacturers.
Critics this weekend voiced amazement at the sums, which they said created a clear conflict of interest and were the â€œfinancial engineâ€ behind a worldwide alarm over the triple measles, mumps and rubella shot.
â€œThese figures are astonishing,â€ said Dr Evan Harris, Liberal Democrat MP for Oxford West and Abingdon.
â€œThis lawsuit was an industry, and an industry peddling what turned out to be a myth.â€
According to the figures, released under the Freedom of Information Act, Wakefield was paid Â£435,643 in fees, plus Â£3,910 expenses.
Wakefieldâ€™s work for the lawyers began two years before he published his now notorious report in The Lancet medical journal in February 1998, proposing a link between the vaccine and autism.
This suggestion, followed by a campaign led by Wakefield, caused immunisation rates to slump from 92% to 78.9%, although they have since partly recovered. In March this year the first British child in 14 years died from measles.
Later The Lancet retracted Wakefieldâ€™s claim and apologised after a Sunday Times investigation showed that his research had been backed with Â£55,000 from lawyers, and that the children in the study used as evidence against the vaccine were also claimants in the lawsuit.
At the time Wakefield denied any conflict of interest and said that the money went to his hospital, not to him personally. No disclosure was made, however, of the vastly greater sums that he was receiving directly from the lawyers.
Five of his former colleagues at the Royal Free hospital, north London, under whose aegis The Lancet paper was written, received a total of Â£183,000 in fees, according to the LSC.